Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dynamic Creation: Extending the Radical Austrian Approach to Entrepreneurship (2010, background): “But just as the DC perspective shifts our attention from entrepreneurs’ perceptions of existing customers to their visions of future ones, it also reconceptualizes this ‘solution space’ from an objective realm entrepreneurs merely search to a subjective one they continually (re)construct through…”
The effects of retail channel integration through the use of information technologies on firm performance (2012, background): “Consequently, competitors would find it more difficult to isolate and identify the factors of success (King, 2007; Lavie, 2006; Pil and Cohen, 2006).”
New modularity indices for modularity assessment and clustering of product architecture (2017, methodology): “The clustering methods using Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle (Rissanen 1978, 1999) were developed by Yu, Yassine, and Goldberg (2007) and Helmer, Yassine, and Meier (2010).”
The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, unknown): “…a contingeny-based approach Pierce (2009) Quantitative OLS and Cox hazard models Examination of shakeouts in the context of business ecosystems Pil & Cohen (2006) Conceptual Literature review; theory and hypothesis development Investigation of the link between product architecture, imitation…”