Instructional efficiency of animation: effects of interactivity through mental reconstruction of static key frames

By Fred Paas, P. V. Gerven, Pieter Wouters. 2007

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73c25b14e5a1e1ea5e772042e060794e5b053f2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Huib K. Tabbers
2. B. D. de Koning
3. Fred Paas
4. Remy M. J. P. Rikers
5. Tamara van Gog
6. John Sweller
7. Richard E. Mayer
8. J. V. van Merriënboer

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Fred Paas
2. Huib K. Tabbers
3. B. D. de Koning
4. Remy M. J. P. Rikers
5. Tamara van Gog
6. John Sweller
7. Richard E. Mayer
8. J. V. van Merriënboer

Citations in the corpus

• Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design (2009, background): “First, the transient nature of animations requires learners to process information that is shown very briefly and disappears before it can be selected for further processing, unless they leave some kind of trace in which key information is kept available (Marcus et al. 2006; Paas et al. 2007).”