Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures

By J. Hooks, C. V. Van Staden. 2011

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of disclosure and assurance quality of corporate sustainability reports on access to finance (2019, background): “Existing evidence also supports that ensuring a higher quality of information could even result in a better investors´ valuation of CSR disclosure (Hooks & van Staden, 2011).”
Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures (2013, background): “As noted by Hooks and van Staden (2011), to evaluate the quality of disclosures would add a further dimension to the assessment of CSR disclosures and would add further subjectivity to the content analysis.”
Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo‐Institutional Framework (2013, unknown): “Given the well articulated limitations of quantity measures, such as word counts (Unerman, 2000; Deegan, 2002; Branco & Rodrigues, 2008; Hooks & Van Staden, 2011) and qualitative proxies, such as disclosure indices (Gray et al., 1995; Parker, 2005; Hackston & Milne, 1996; Gompers et al., 2003), we…”