The Values and Lifestyles of Idiocentrics and Allocentrics in an Individualist Culture: A Descriptive Approach
By Mohan J. Dutta-Bergman, W. Wells. 2002
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73753e7fb0b74897d154129986fb21c5b280f816
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Explaining variation in conspicuous luxury consumption: An individual differences' perspective (2014, methodology): “Self-concept orientation was measured with Singelis's (1994) scale (example items include “I am comfortable with being singled out for praise or rewards” and “If someone who is close to me fails, I feel responsible”), status seeking with Eastman et al.'s (1999) status consumption scale (“I would buy”
- Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation (2010, background): “Several studies use this idiocentrism–allocentrism scale to study cross-cultural differences including the impact of past experience, expectations, and affordability on purchase intentions (Lee 2000), consumer values and lifestyles (Dutta-Bergman and Wells 2002), value-attitude relations (Gregory et”
- Values and lifestyles of individualists and collectivists: a study on Chinese, Japanese, British and US consumers (2004, background): “…and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0736-3761.htm hand, disparate results based on the two-level analyses of the same phenomena will qualify the theory as weak or insufficient in explaining certain cross-cultural differences (Dutta-Bergman and Wells, 2002).”