Person–Environment Fit and Creative Behavior: Differential Impacts of Supplies–Values and Demands–Abilities Versions of Fit

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contextual Inhibitors of Employee Creativity in Organizations (2009, methodology): “It would be meaningful to explore the underlying processes that cause these buffering and intensifying effects, such as creative self-efficacy or situation-specific creative motivation (Choi, 2004a).”
Employer–Employee Congruence in Environmental Values: An Exploration of Effects on Job Satisfaction and Creativity (2014, unknown): “In the educational setting, Choi (2004) finds that when the desired and perceived levels of creative climate in the classroom are congruent, students report being most creative.”
Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection (2014, background): “Choi (2004) found that desired, but not current, creative climate benefited creativity.”
A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity (2012, background): “The choice of variables to be included here was guided by the overarching premise that creative behavior can be motivated by both internal and external factors (Choi, 2004; Oldham and Cummings, 1996; Shalley et al., 2004).”