Communicating in Mentoring Relationships: A Theory for Enactment
By P. Kalbfleisch. 2002
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72a63655126d40afdc0f767801868cb2c9f72ff3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Clinical Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Models of mentoring in communication (2004, background): “…contributed greatly to the study of mentoring (see, e.g., Bokeno & Gantt, 2000; Hill, Bahniuk, & Dobos, 1989; Hill, Bahniuk, Dobos, & Rouner, 1989; Kalbfleisch, 1997, 2000, 2002; Kalbfleisch & Davies, 1991; Kalbfleisch & Keyton, 1995; Locke & Williams, 2000; Waldeck, Orrego, Plax, & Kearney,…”
- Youth Mentoring and Resilience: Implications for Practice (2008, background): “Research (Grossman & Rhodes, 2002; Kalbfleisch, 2002) has further suggested that difficulties often arise from such failings as the misuse of power (e.g., exploitation), inappropriate boundaries, (e.g., breaching confidentiality, improper disclosures), and communication breakdowns (e.g., breaking…”
- Using Mentoring Enactment Theory to Explore the Doctoral Student–Advisor Mentoring Relationship (2012, methodology): “To extend extant mentoring and relational maintenance research, the purpose of this study was to examine doctoral students’ use of relational maintenance behaviors with their advisors using mentoring enactment theory (MET; Kalbfleisch, 2002).”
- Understanding the Memorable Messages First-Generation College Students Receive from On-Campus Mentors (2012, background): “…the effects of communication competence in mentoring relationships (Kalbfleisch & Davies, 1993), conceptual models for understanding mentoring (Kalbfleisch & Davies, 1993), and communication aspects of mentoring relationships (Bullis & Bach, 1989; Kalbfleisch, 2002; Kalbfleisch & Keyton, 1995).”
- Interpersonal Communication: Theoretical Perspectives, Future Prospects (2005, unknown): “Thus, they afford considerably more explanatory leverage than theories developed exclusively to explain social interaction phenomena within highly specific relationship types, for example, mentor-protégé relationships (Kalbfleisch, 2002).”