Structural Equations with Latent Variables
By Kenneth A. Bollen. 1989
Subfields: Statistics and Probability, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Jan Peters
- Peter Buhlmann
- Dominik Janzing
- Marloes H. Maathuis
- Mathias Drton
- Kun Zhang
- Joris M. Mooij
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Jan Peters
- Dominik Janzing
- Joris M. Mooij
- Stefan Bauer
- Kun Zhang
- Stephan Bongers
- Nicolai Meinshausen
Citations in the corpus
- Counterfactual Fairness (2017, background): “Such equations are also known as structural equations [2].”
- Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairness (2018, background): “…interest; • U is a set of latent (that is, unobservable) background variables that will represent all possible causes of V and which jointly follow some distribution P ( U ); • F is a set of functions { f 1 , . . . , f n } , one for each Such equations are also known as structural equations [4].”
- Causal Models for Dynamical Systems (2020, background): “While this description can be made formal in various ways, we focus on one that is based on structural causal models [Wright, 1921, Bollen, 1989, Pearl, 2009].”
- Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals (2015, background): “Among them are the framework of potential outcomes and counter-factuals [cf. Dawid, 2000, Rubin, 2005]; or structural equation modelling [cf. Bollen, 1989, Robins et al., 2000, Pearl, 2009] and corresponding graphical modeling [cf. Lauritzen and Spiegelhalter, 1988, Greenland et al., 1999, Spirtes…”
- From Ordinary Differential Equations to Structural Causal Models: the deterministic case (2013, positive): “In this section we will show how an LEE representation can be mapped to the more popular representation of Structural Causal Models, also known as Structural Equation Models (Bollen, 1989).”
- Fairness in Decision-Making - The Causal Explanation Formula (2018, methodology): “The path analysis method gained momentum in the social sciences during 1960’s, becoming extremely popular in the form of the mediation formula in which the total effect of X on Y is decomposed into direct and indirect components (Baron and Kenny 1986; Bollen 1989; Duncan 1975; Fox 1980).”
- Causal inference in statistics: An overview (2009, neutral): “…identification has received considerable attention in econometrics (Hurwicz, 1950; Marschak, 1950; Koopmans, 1953) and social science (Duncan, 1975; Bollen, 1989), usually in linear parametric settings, were it reduces to asking whether some model parameter, β, has a unique solution in terms of…”
- Causal Discovery with Reinforcement Learning (2019, methodology): “An effective approach to studying causal relationships is to conduct controlled randomized experiments, which however is too expensive or even impossible in certain fields such as social sciences [2] and bioinformatics [16].”
- Anchor regression: Heterogeneous data meet causality (2018, neutral): “Both these results are direct implications of well-known invariance properties of causal models (Aldrich, 1989; Haavelmo, 1944; Pearl, 2009).”
- Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty in Indian Commercial Banks (2009, unknown): “When there are direct paths, standardised path coeffi cients reveal the relative importance of the independent variables (Bollen, 1989; Hair et al., 1998).”
- The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation (2008, unknown): “Suggested values of IFI and RFI for good fit are >0.90 (Bollen 1989, Salisbury et al. 2002).”
- Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: are they separable? (2006, unknown): “Fit indices such as the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990), the bollen fit index (IFI; Bollen, 1989), and the normed fit index (NFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980) provide a further measure of fit computed by comparing the hypothesized model against a null model in which the relations between the l”
- El bienestar social: su concepto y medición (2005, unknown): “…debido a la extensión y complejidad del modelo teórico propuesto, hubiera sido deseable un tamaño muestral mayor, dado que los indicadores de ajuste disminuyen en m estras relativamente pequeñas y a medida que aumenta el número de parámetros a estimar (Hu y Bentler, 1999; Bollen, 1989).”
- 3. The Foundations of Causal Inference (2010, unknown): “From Linear to Nonparametric Models and Graphs Structural equation modeling (SEM) has been the main vehicle for effect analysis in economics and the behavioral and social sciences (Goldberger 1972; Duncan 1975; Bollen 1989).”
- Exploring students’ reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations (2009, unknown): “SEM is considered an appropriate statistical procedure as it enables examination of both direct and mediating effects between motivational variables and academic performance (Bollen, 1989; Byrne, 1998; Kline, 2005).”
- How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question (2003, unknown): “Bollen , 1989 ) .”
- Parental Psychological Distress, Parent - Child Relationship Qualities, and Child Adjustment: Direct, Mediating, and Reciprocal Pathways (2005, unknown): “Relative χ2 index (χ2/df) values below 3 are generally considered indicative of a close fit between the hypothetical model and the sample data (Bollen,1989).”
- Antecedents of commitment and trust in customer-supplier relationship in high technology markets. (2001, unknown): “Due to the sensitivity of the x 2 value to the sample size, the x 2 statistic is not an appropriate measure of the goodness-of-fit of the measurement model [66–68].”
- Parental Involvement in Predicting School Motivation: Similar and Differential Effects Across Ethnic Groups (2012, unknown): “When applying with noncontinuous or nonnormal data, traditional estimation methods such as maximum likelihood (ML) may produce inaccurate parameter estimates and standard errors (Bollen, 1989).”