Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China
By Yanmei Zhu, X. Wittmann, Mike W. Peng. 2012
410 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71a48ffb464f18fdcd2d51bab009b5bf5ece7a8f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ziliang Deng
- Peter S. Hofman
- Poh Kam Wong
- Justin Tan
- Doren Chadee
- Jing Zhang
- Banjo Roxas
- Alexander Newman
In Economics and Econometrics
- Ziliang Deng
- Peter S. Hofman
- Poh Kam Wong
- Justin Tan
- Doren Chadee
- Jing Zhang
- Banjo Roxas
- Alexander Newman
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Banjo Roxas
- Ziliang Deng
- Peter S. Hofman
- Poh Kam Wong
- Doren Chadee
- Alexander Newman
- E. Thompson
- David Urbano
Citations in the corpus
- Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs (2012, positive): “Our findings are also consistent with recent studies which suggest that institutional barriers exacerbate the problems faced by private firms in conducting product innovation with external organizations (Yang et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2012).”
- Institutional environment, innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia (2013, background): “Institutional voids lead to the escalation of transaction costs and uncertainty that can stifle the ability of firms to access the resources required to support or stimulate their innovativeness (Peng, 2010; Zhu et al., 2011).”
- When does investment in political ties improve firm performance? The contingent effect of innovation activities (2014, background): “In a recent survey, Chinese executives reported that the complexity in the implementation of regulations is one of the most important barriers to innovation in SMEs in China (Zhu et al., 2012).”