Sub‐National Institutional Contingencies, Network Positions, and IJV Partner Selection

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Institutional open access at home and outward internationalization (2015, unknown): “…a small number of studies (Atsmon, Kertesz, & Vittal, 2011), the emphasis has been on how domestic firms survive or exit (Chang & Xu, 2008; Lebedev & Peng, 2014), how foreign firms enter (Meyer & Nguyen, 2005; Shi et al., 2012, 2014b), and how foreign firms’ affiliates perform (Chan et al., 2010).”
Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets (2013, background): “They also have continued to attract significant research attention (Shi et al., 2012).”
Human Capital and CEO Compensation during Institutional Transitions (2015, unknown): “As a result, it has been widely used in research in accounting (Hung et al., 2012a), economics (Hornstein, 2011), finance (Fan et al., 2013), and management (Gao et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2014).”
Domestic alliance network to attract foreign partners: Evidence from international joint ventures in China (2014, methodology): “Similar to the Security Data Corporation Platinum database, the WIND database has reasonably consistent and complete coverage on alliance activities, and has been used in recent research (Lin et al., 2009a; Shi, Sun, & Peng, 2012; Sun & Lee, 2013).”