Of Mice and Managers@@@In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power
By Ralph P. Hummel, David G. Carnevale, Shoshana Zuboff. 1992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- V. Venkatesh
- Michael G. Morris
- Youngjin Yoo
- Kalle J. Lyytinen
- Heshan Sun
- Sharon K. Parker
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Satish Nambisan
Citations in the corpus
- Toward a Workplace Pedagogy: Guidance, Participation, and Engagement (2002, background): “The increasing need to learn the symbolic knowledge required by technology (Martin & Scribner, 1991), the opaque quality of work processes obscured by technology (Barley & Orr, 1997), the remote processes of technology work (Zuboff, 1988), and the complex relations between coworkers (e.”
- Organizational Learning: An Empirical Assessment of Process in Small U.K. Manufacturing Firms (2001, background): “Earlier, Zuboff (1988) had suggested that new knowledge provides the basis for “liberating” the organization from the past by permitting the organization to move beyond the use of information to control operations and instead exploit knowledge as a source for more innovative strategic responses to…”
- Artificial Intelligence as Augmenting Automation: Implications for Employment (2020, methodology): “The argument was that the tacit nature of human machinery operation was now replaced by the human operation of computerized machinery utilizing digital interfaces (Form, 1987; Zuboff, 1988).”
- Fair and balanced?: bias in bug-fix datasets (2009, background): “Looking forward, we ask, what can be done about bias? One possibility is the advent of systems like Jazz that force developers to link commits to bugs and/or feature requests; however experience in other domains suggest that enforcement provides little assurance of ample data quality [51].”
- The technostress trifecta ‐ techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research (2019, background): “In terms of characteristics of the organization, a surveillance prone culture implies IS enabled monitoring of employees, which can generate in them, fears of job insecurity, loss of privacy, and infringement of personal space (Fairweather, 1999; Zuboff, 1988, 2015).”