Going Global: Understanding the Choice Process of the Intent to Study Abroad

By Mark H. Salisbury, Paul D. Umbach, Michael B. Paulsen, Ernest T. Pascarella. 2009

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fb54e601a5ca1c65b4120122cd61f39c7ee4400

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. David Jamieson-Drake
2. Datha Damron-Martinez
3. J. Hemsley‐Brown
4. Jiali Luo
5. Adrien Presley
6. Lin Zhang
7. Izhar Oplatka

In Education

1. David Jamieson-Drake
2. J. Hemsley‐Brown
3. Jiali Luo
4. Izhar Oplatka
5. Mei-Lin Chang

In Political Science and International Relations

1. David Jamieson-Drake
2. J. Hemsley‐Brown
3. Jiali Luo
4. Izhar Oplatka

Citations in the corpus

• University choice: what do we know, what don’t we know and what do we still need to find out? (2015, background): “Although there are some studies in this area, including studies that take into account choice of international students (Gatfield et al., 1999; Gatfield and Chen, 2006; Pyvis and Chapman, 2007; Chen, 2008; Salisbury et al., 2009; Daily et al., 2010; Padlee et al., 2010; Wilkins and Huisman, 2011) mo”
• A Study of Business Student Choice to Study Abroad: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior (2010, methodology): “Using the human capital and student-choice theories, Salisbury et al. (2009) conclude first, that the student’s family’s socioeconomic status is positively related to the intent to study abroad.”
• Graduate employability: a conceptual framework for understanding employers’ perceptions (2012, unknown): “…cultures’’, ‘‘stronger intercultural communication skills’’, ‘‘improved personal and professional self-image’’, ‘‘better foreign language skills’’, ‘‘selfconfidence’’, ‘‘ability to handle ambiguity’’, ‘‘insight into their own value systems’’ and ‘‘overall maturity’’ (Salisbury et al. 2009, p. 120).”
• Predictors of Study Abroad Intent, Participation, and College Outcomes (2015, background): “Additionally, students in the humanities were more likely than students studying engineering to go abroad to pursue knowledge and perspectives unavailable at home (IIE 2013; Salisbury et al. 2009; Stallman et al. 2010; Stroud 2010; Twombly et al. 2012).”
• The Added Value of Study Abroad (2014, background): “Selection biases also account for a student’s decision to study abroad rather than to remain on campus, for the duration of their study abroad program, as well as for the region and the subject matter they select for their study abroad experience (Salisbury et al., 2009).”