Recurring Mutations Found by Sequencing an Acute Myeloid Leukemia Genome

By Elaine R. Mardis, Li Ding, D. Dooling, David E. Larson, M. McLellan, Ken Chen, Daniel C. Koboldt, R. Fulton, K. D. Delehaunty, S. McGrath and 48 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2009

2,302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND The full complement of DNA mutations that are responsible for the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not yet known. METHODS We used massively parallel DNA sequencing to obtain a very high level of coverage (approximately 98%) of a primary, cytogenetically normal, de novo genome for AML with minimal maturation (AML-M1) and a matched normal skin genome. RESULTS We identified 12 acquired (somatic) mutations within the coding sequences of genes and 52 somatic point mutations in conserved or regulatory portions of the genome. All mutations appeared to be heterozygous and present in nearly all cells in the tumor sample. Four of the 64 mutations occurred in at least 1 additional AML sample in 188 samples that were tested. Mutations in NRAS and NPM1 had been identified previously in patients with AML, but two other mutations had not been identified. One of these mutations, in the IDH1 gene, was present in 15 of 187 additional AML genomes tested and was strongly associated with normal cytogenetic status; it was present in 13 of 80 cytogenetically normal samples (16%). The other was a nongenic mutation in a genomic region with regulatory potential and conservation in higher mammals; we detected it in one additional AML tumor. The AML genome that we sequenced contains approximately 750 point mutations, of which only a small fraction are likely to be relevant to pathogenesis. CONCLUSIONS By comparing the sequences of tumor and skin genomes of a patient with AML-M1, we have identified recurring mutations that may be relevant for pathogenesis.

Subfields: Genetics, Hematology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6da37aabffaf8b75ea48030c262b1cc051405c8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. H. Ohgaki
  2. P. Kleihues
  3. Craig B. Thompson
  4. M. V. Vander Heiden
  5. Yi Zhang
  6. G. Semenza
  7. Hao Wu
  8. Ralph J. Deberardinis

In Hematology

  1. G. Semenza
  2. Yi Zhang
  3. T. Suda
  4. Hao Wu
  5. Michael R. Stratton
  6. Benjamin L. Ebert
  7. Siddhartha Jaiswal
  8. K. Takubo

In Molecular Biology

  1. M. V. Vander Heiden
  2. Ralph J. Deberardinis
  3. Hao Wu
  4. Craig B. Thompson
  5. Chuan He
  6. Yi Zhang
  7. G. Semenza
  8. Elaine R. Mardis

Citations in the corpus