The impact of feedback frequency on learning and task performance: Challenging the ‘‘more is better’’ assumption

By Chak Fu Lam, D. S. Derue, Elizabeth P. Karam, J. Hollenbeck. 2011

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ccde504938bbba06e757df232cae52dfa5176df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jukka Luoma
2. S. Ruutu
3. Henrikki Tikkanen
4. A. King

Citations in the corpus

• Time delays, competitive interdependence, and firm performance (2017, methodology): “Our model builds upon the literature on reinforcement learning in psychology and management (e.g., Atkins, Wood, and Rutgers, 2002; Diehl and Sterman, 1995; Lam et al., 2011; Lurie and Swaminathan, 2009; Rahmandad, 2008; Rahmandad et al., 2009), which emphasizes actors’ tendency to move in the actio”
• Individual Investor Perceptions and Behavior During the Financial Crisis (2013, unknown): “Receiving (too) much information can result in information overload (Lam et al., 2011), which stimulates status-quo bias, thus potentially reducing individual investors’ trading activity during the crisis (cf. Agnew and Szykman, 2005).”