Do people really believe they are above average
By Elanor F. Williams, Thomas Gilovich. 2008
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c498bc986ed9482372590319a8ee6bdd1615c84
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Constantine Sedikides
- M. Alicke
- Huajian Cai
- L. Gaertner
- J. Kennedy
- Thomas Gilovich
- Fiery Cushman
- Peter H. Ditto
In Sociology and Political Science
- Constantine Sedikides
- L. Gaertner
- M. Alicke
- Huajian Cai
- L. Jampol
- Cameron Anderson
- Amit Kumar
- Don A Moore
Citations in the corpus
- Financial literacy and financial behavior (2015, unknown): “Survey responses are “vulnerable to social desirability,” meaning that if financial behaviors are viewed as having “a normative valence” then respondents are apt to overstate “good” financial behaviors and understate ‘bad’ financial behaviors (Willis, 2008).”
- A wonderful life: experiential consumption and the pursuit of happiness (2015, background): “People tend to think of their prized assets as more a reflection of who they are than their warts, foibles, and shortcomings (Dunning, Meyerowitz, & Holzberg, 1989; Williams & Gilovich, 2008).”
- Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do (2009, background): “Indeed, people do truly believe they are above average (Williams & Gilovich, 2008).”
- On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem (2015, background): “People truly believe in their better-than-average judgments, betting money on them (Williams & Gilovich, 2008).”
- When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence (2013, background): “Such overconfidence persists even when the stakes are high and individuals have incentives to estimate their relative abilities accurately (Ehrlinger, Johnson, Banner, Dunning, & Kruger, 2008; Hoelzl & Rustichini, 2005; Williams & Gilovich, 2008).”