“Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions

503 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ideology of the ethical consumption gap (2016, background): “Finally, studies by Carrington et al. (2014) and Oberseder et al. (2011) point to individual’s predilection to internally prioritize ethical concerns as a key factor in the salience of specific ethical concerns at the cash register.”
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption (2014, background): “Some studies consider why consumers do not always choose ethical options (e.g., Chatzidakis et al., 2007; Bray et al., 2011; Öberseder et al., 2011).”
How Techniques of Neutralization Legitimize Norm- and Attitude-Inconsistent Consumer Behavior (2013, background): “Several authors have tried to pin down factors impeding such an attitude-consistent purchasing behavior (Bray et al. 2011; Öberseder et al. 2011; Papaoikonomou et al. 2011).”
Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism (2017, background): “This result may partly explain why, despite increasing concern about environmental issues, many consumers are still reluctant to purchase green products (Öberseder et al., 2011).”