Different Explanations for Correlated Disturbance Terms in MTMM Studies

By Willem E. Saris, C. Aalberts. 2003

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bb33d624e49dfc019df31abb33f9d33f1940b17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Melanie Revilla
2. J. Krosnick
3. T. Thomas
4. Yves Van Vaerenbergh
5. Maggie Geuens
6. Niels Schillewaert
7. Bert Weijters
8. Eric M. Shaeffer

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. T. Thomas
2. Yves Van Vaerenbergh
3. Bert Weijters
4. Niels Schillewaert
5. J. Krosnick
6. Melanie Revilla
7. Maggie Geuens
8. Eric M. Shaeffer

In Statistics and Probability

1. Melanie Revilla
2. J. Krosnick
3. T. Thomas
4. Yves Van Vaerenbergh
5. Niels Schillewaert
6. Bert Weijters
7. Maggie Geuens
8. Eric M. Shaeffer

Citations in the corpus

• Response Styles in Survey Research: A Literature Review of Antecedents, Consequences, and Remedies (2013, methodology): “Second, not all approaches simultaneously account for multiple types of RS. Multi-trait–multi-method models account for ARS and DARS but not ERS or MRS (Saris & Aalberts, 2003).”
• Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales (2014, methodology): “By IS scale, we mean, following Saris et al. (2010), a scale where “the categories used to express the opinion are exactly those answers we would like to obtain for this item.” For instance, we can propose the statement “immigration is good for the economy” with an AD scale: “Agree-Disagree”. Altern”
• ASSESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL WELL‐BEING: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE I COPPE SCALE (2015, methodology): “Residuals for pairs of indicator variables that shared an item stem (e.g., IN WB PA and CO WB PA) were free to covary because a method effect was hypothesized by time period referenced (Saris & Aalberts, 2003).”
• Assessing response styles across modes of data collection (2008, methodology): “Third, the method factor in MTMM models essentially corresponds to a factor that captures only the net effect of ARS and DRS (Saris and Aalberts 2003).”
• Comparing questions with agree/ disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options (2010, methodology): “To analyze conventional MTMM correlation matrices, various analytic models have been suggested (Alwin, 1974; Andrews, 1984; Browne, 1984; Marsh and Bailey, 1991; Saris and Andrews, 1991; Coenders and Saris, 2000; Eid, 2000; Saris and Aalberts, 2003).”