Comparing questions with agree/ disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021, unknown): “Additionally, our use of agreement scales to assess scholarly devaluation may have resulted in acquiescence bias (Saris et al., 2010); however, this bias is weaker among highly educated samples like ours who are used to responding to survey items (Weijters et al., 2010) and this format has been…”
Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales (2014, methodology): “This last step is potentially the problematic one (Fowler 1995; Saris et al. 2010) since the translation of a respondent’s opinion into one of the proposed response categories is not obvious.”
Common Method Variance in Advertising Research: When to Be Concerned and How to Control for It (2017, background): “Several other procedural techniques have been presented in the extant literature that are generally easy to implement and could serve at least to reduce the effects of CMV (MacKenzie and Podsakoff 2012; Saris et al. 2010); we strongly recommend them.”