Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants

By Doris Schartinger, C. Rammer, M. M. Fischer, Josef Fröhlich. 2002

727 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b36fea26a075bc19c5b8ec7f4d24704cd5b1d69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “Cohen et al. (2002), using data from the Carnegie Mellon survey of industrial R&D, revealed that the most important channels firms use in their interacting with universities were open channels, such as publications, conferences, informal links and consultancy activities.”
Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations (2009, background): “At the same time, although the literature on university-industry relationships emphasizes the range of collaboration types (Cohen et al., 2002; Meyer-Krahmer and Schmoch, 1998; Schartinger et al., 2002), it does not examine the rationales underpinning these activities.”
The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data (2013, background): “, Japan, and Europe have found that geographic proximity does not necessarily facilitate university–industry interactions (Beise and Stahl, 1999; Bercovitz and Feldman, 2011; Schartinger et al., 2002; Zucker and Darby, 2001).”
Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems (2020, background): “More than ever, universities and firms will collaborate based on the belief that their complementarity will reinforce the strength and the gains concerning they partnership, given that the absence of competition will prevent opportunistic behaviors, reinforcing trust [57,69] and combining different ”
Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy (2010, background): “Several authors (Bonaccorsi and Piccaluga, 1994; D’Este and Fontana, 2007; Mora Valentin, 2002; Schartinger et al., 2002) highlight the many other typesof linksbetweenuniversities andfirms, ranging frominformal meetings to researchers’ involvement in industry commissioned consultancy, to joint resea”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, unknown): “Similar results pointing to the relatively low importance of intellectual property (IP) transfer were found by a number of other studies (Levin et al., 1987; Klevorick et al., 1995; Mansfield, 1991; Pavitt, 1991; Agrawal and Henderson, 2002; Schartinger et al., 2002; D'Este and Patel, 2007).”
Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model (2019, background): “The patterns are further identified as joint research, contract research, staff mobility, and training [44].”
Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations (2017, background): “…challenge to nuance the effects of distinct interaction channels by considering short versus long-term goals, as well as acknowledge the role of the context by exploring outcomes across different sectors and collaborative projects with varying intensity of interaction (Schartinger et al. 2002).”
Universities and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as Sources of Knowledge for Innovative Firms in Peripheral Regions (2015, methodology): “According to SCHARTINGER et al. (2002), low- and medium-technology manufacturing firms are likely to look for technical services such as analysis, calibrations and technical accreditations, or they may use university consulting to gain access to expertise they lack.”
Objectives , Agreements and Matching in Science-Industry Collaborations : Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle (2003, methodology): “Thursby and Thursby (2000) addressed the issue whether the dramatic increase in the patenting and licensing activities in the US universities was due to an increase in the willingness to patent discoveries or if it was the consequence of a shift in the nature of their research contents, i.”