Objectives , Agreements and Matching in Science-Industry Collaborations : Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle

By Nicolas Carayol. 2003

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a488a81445b2799180621f0b7662839562888fde

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Markus Perkmann
2. Gabriela Dutrenit
3. C. Fuentes
4. Pablo D'Este
5. Nicolas Carayol

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Markus Perkmann
2. Gabriela Dutrenit
3. C. Fuentes
4. Pablo D'Este

In Strategy and Management

1. Markus Perkmann
2. Gabriela Dutrenit
3. C. Fuentes
4. Pablo D'Este
5. Nicolas Carayol
6. Marcel Bogers

Citations in the corpus

• Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, unknown): “Collaboration between academia and industry is voluntary and, hence, collaboration will depend on anticipated benefits (Carayol, 2003).”
• ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY (2007, background): “From the detailed analysis of a set of collaborations between academic laboratories and firms in Europe and in the US, Carayol (2003a) shows that raising funds from private companies can be seen, at lab level, as a coherent strategy which also determines the type of research performed and the lab ”
• Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? (2006, unknown): “In other words, involvement in both realms of activity may produce mutually beneficial spill-over effects, which affect scientific performance as well—at least where research topics in both activity realms are closely related (Carayol, 2003).”
• Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit (2012, background): “…Mathews and Mei-Chih, 2007; Jensen et al. 2007; Ayadi, et al., 2009); still other studies have analysed PRO-I interactions from both perspectives (Carayol, 2004; Bekkers and Bodas Freitas, 2008; Intarakumnerd and Schiller, 2009; Dutrénit, et al., 2010; Arza and Vazquez, 2010; Fernandes, et…”
• Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations (2009, background): “…inter-organizational relationships (e.g. joint research or contract research) to spin-off companies, to IP transfer including patenting and licensing (Bercovitz and Feldman, 2006; Bonaccorsi and Piccaluga, 1994; Carayol, 2003; Cohen et al., 2002; D'Este and Patel, 2007; Schartinger et al., 2002).”
• University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda (2007, unknown): “In addition, there are a series of studies that are based on datasets specifically covering university-industry collaborations (Caloghirou et al. 2001; Carayol 2003).”