The Role of Personality in Leadership: An Application of the Five-Factor Model in the Australian Military
By Luke M. Mccormack, D. Mellor. 2002
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6acb07c937d7c4fb8b70391049aa6d4663395acf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Francesca Gino
- Dennis McGurk
- Jarle Eid
- P. Bliese
- Bjørn Helge Johnsen
- Paul T. Bartone
- Adam M. Grant
- David Hofmann
In Social Psychology
- Francesca Gino
- Adam M. Grant
- David Hofmann
- Jarle Eid
- P. Bliese
- Bjørn Helge Johnsen
- Paul T. Bartone
- Scott Snook
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive and Personality Predictors of Leader Performance in West Point Cadets (2002, background): “This finding is consistent with the results of McCormack and Mellor (2002), who identified conscientiousness as a predictor of leader success in the Australian military.”
- Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity (2011, background): “The description then summarized studies showing the potential costs of highly extraverted leadership behavior and the potential benefits of acting less extraverted (e.g., Judge et al., 2009; McCormack & Mellor, 2002).”
- Military leadership: A context specific review $ (2003, background): “…may be positively related to performance in schooling and evaluation settings because they help individuals ‘‘stand-out’’ relative to their peers (Thomas, Dickson, & Bliese, 2001), but may be negatively related to leadership performance in actual task settings (McCormack & Mellor, 2002).”
- Big five personality factors, hardiness, and social judgment as predictors of leader performance (2009, background): “…the complete domain of normal personality (Digman, 1990; McCrae, 1992), and more research is appearing that explores the influence of these five general personality dimensions on job performance and leadership (e.g. Barrick and Mount, 1991; McCormack and Mellor, 2002; Rubenzer et al., 2000).”
- Psychological Hardiness Predicts Adaptability in Military Leaders: A prospective study (2013, unknown): “A growing body of research has explored the influence of these five general personality dimensions on leadership and job performance (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1991; McCormack and Mellor, 2002; Rubenzer, Faschingbauer & Ones, 2000).”