The Way We Think

By G. Fauconnier, Mark Turner. 2002

721 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a1945abcc78d6f7883b08ded0aa30fc7c351172

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Material anchors for conceptual blends (2005, background): “Fauconnier and Turner (2002) devote a chapter to “things” in which they draw”
Creating mathematical infinities: Metaphor, blending, and the beauty of transfinite cardinals (2005, methodology): “The fact that the final resultant state is indeed final, means that there is no 5 Details of conceptual blending can be seen in other contributions in this volume, and in the original work of Fauconnier and Turner (1998, 2002).”
A Cognitive Approach to the Metaphor Translation of Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life (2020, background): “In the process of mapping, metaphorical blending, also named as conceptual integration (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002), presents a better interpretation for the cognitive process of language production, especially when dealing with complicated images, and comprehension of conceptual metaphors grounded…”
Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal* (2010, background): “Some of the more prominent theories of cognitive linguistics include Cognitive Grammar (e.g., Langacker, 2008), conceptualist semantics (e.g., Talmy, 2000), construction grammar (e.g., Croft, 2001), metaphor theory (e.g., Kövecses, 2005) and mental space theory (e.g., Fauconnier & Turner, 2002).”
Conceptual Metaphor Meets Conceptual Change (2009, background): “…many human concepts are represented metaphorically has been the central claim emerging from research on conceptual metaphor, a strand of research in cognitive linguistics [see e.g., Fauconnier & Turner, 2002; Lakoff, 1987, 1990, 1993; Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999; Langacker, 1987, 1991].”
Making Sense of a Blend. A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Metaphor (2005, methodology): “In Fauconnier & Turner 2002, there are occasional references to “focus inputs” and to “topic spaces”.”
On the Birth and Growth of Concepts (2008, background): “…although this type of representation has much to recommend it in terms of understanding preverbal concepts, as well as analogical thought and imagination in general (Fauconnier, 1994; Fauconnier & Turner, 2002), it is not crucial for understanding the genesis of concepts out of spatial information.”
Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? (2014, background): “Fauconnier and Turner (2002) build on Koestler’s ideas in their theory of ‘conceptual blending’ which contends that all human thinking and imagination (e.g. language, art, religion, science and other feats of ingenuity) are the result of the blending of metaphors.”
Antonymy and negation (2006, background): “The longer response times for the negated test items may be explained by the necessity for the language user to construe both a factual and the counterfactual space (Langacker, 1991; Fauconnier and Turner, 2002).”