What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination
By Keiichi Kobayashi. 2005
247 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69b4823b5ddd78a55466d18459008be431363559
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Education
- Alexandra List
- Daniel M. Oppenheimer
- Pam Mueller
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Keiichi Kobayashi
- Emily M. Grossnickle
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Kathryn S. McCarthy
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Alexandra List
- Daniel M. Oppenheimer
- Pam Mueller
- Keiichi Kobayashi
- Suzanne Hidi
- Gordon Pennycook
- Andrew J. Martin
Citations in the corpus
- Combined Effects of Note‐Taking/‐Reviewing on Learning and the Enhancement through Interventions: A meta‐analytic review (2006, background): “Kobayashi's ( 2005 ) meta‐analysis indicated that the first three types of intervention did not affect the encoding effects.”
- Toward an Integrated Framework of Multiple Text Use (2019, background): “Note Taking There are several benefits associated with note taking, including benefits attributable to encoding and to external storage (Kiewra, 1989; Kobayashi, 2005, 2006; Rickards & Friedman, 1978).”
- The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard (2014, background): “…hypothesis has been supported by studies finding positive effects of note taking in the absence of review (e.g., Aiken, Thomas, & Shennum, 1975; Bretzing & Kulhavy, 1981; Einstein, Morris, & Smith, 1985); however, other results have been more mixed (see Kiewra, 1985; Kobayashi, 2005, for reviews).”