Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

By Sophie Molholm, Walter Ritter, Daniel C. Javitt, John J. Foxe. 2004

400 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Researchers often presume that visual and auditory stimuli are integrated when they are semantically congruent and some form of enhancement in their participants’ behavioral performance or brain activities will be observed (Laurienti et al., 2004; Molholm et al., 2004; Taylor et al., 2006; Hein et a”
Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “[11] came to a similar conclusion using a somewhat different experimental paradigm: In their combined behavioral and ERP study, participants were”
Prior auditory information shapes visual category-selectivity in ventral occipito-temporal cortex (2010, neutral): “Furthermore, audiovisual semantic (in)congruency manipulations demonstrated that task-irrelevant sensory stimuli can modify activations in another sensory modality as a function of semantic congruency (Laurienti et al., 2003; Molholm et al., 2004; Noppeney et al., 2008).”
Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. (2006, background): “For example, recent electrophysiological studies in both humans (e.g., Foxe and others 2000; Molholm and others 2002, 2004; Murray and others 2005) and nonhuman primates (e.g., Schroeder and Foxe 2002, 2004; Schroeder and others 2004; Foxe and Schroeder 2005) have shown extremely rapid multisensory…”
Distinct Functional Contributions of Primary Sensory and Association Areas to Audiovisual Integration in Object Categorization (2010, result): “These direct modulatory effects are in line with previous EEG and intracranial recordings in humans showing very early audiovisual integration effects (Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2004; Besle et al., 2008).”
The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. (2005, background): “In addition to its role in visual object-related processing [14], the LOC and neighboring visual cortices have been repeatedly implicated in auditory–visual multisensory convergence and interactions [3,5,9,15], including higher-order multisensory object and linguistic processes [1,2,4,9,16,21,24,31]”
Sound-Induced Enhancement of Low-Intensity Vision: Multisensory Influences on Human Sensory-Specific Cortices and Thalamic Bodies Relate to Perceptual Enhancement of Visual Detection Sensitivity (2010, background): “To our knowledge, the earliest impact of concurrent visual stimuli on auditory event-related potential components has been found to emerge at 50 ms after stimulus, well beyond the initial phase of auditory processing (Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2004).”
Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect (2008, background): “This result might be explained (in the same way as the results of Laurienti et al. 2004 and Molholm et al. 2004) in terms of a redundancy gain eVect (cf. Miller 1982).”
The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. (2016, background): “On the other hand, higher-level factors, such as semantic congruence, seem ineffective in modulating multisensory processes in the primary visual cortex (Fort et al., 2002b; Molholm et al., 2004; YuvalGreenberg and Deouell, 2007).”
The brain uses single-trial multisensory memories to discriminate without awareness (2005, positive): “, 2002, 2004c), the LOC has also been shown to have multisensory properties (e.g., Amedi et al., 2001; Amedi et al., in press; Molholm et al., 2004).”
The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect (2015, background): “Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies also found semantic influences on the neural correlates of audiovisual integration (Molholm et al. 2004; Hein et al. 2007; Stekelenburg and Vroomen 2007; Yuval-Greenberg and Deouell 2007).”
Sound alters activity in human V1 in association with illusory visual perception (2006, background): “These single unit studies are complemented by human event-related potential work demonstrating interactions between auditory and visual (Fort et al., 2002; Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2002, 2004 )o r somatosensory (Foxe et al., 2002; Murray et al., 2005) stimuli at very short latency”
The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing (2016, background): “Most evidence suggests that the brain is sensitive to (in)congruence of object semantic features in multisensory stimuli starting at approximately 150–200 ms post-stimulus (evoked responses: Raij et al. 2000; Molholm et al. 2004; Diaconescu et al. 2011; but see Naci et al. 2012 for effects <100 ms; ”
Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes (2016, methodology): “…some instances stimulus congruence might not play a role in modulating multisensory processing unless it is relevant to the current task [see also Molholm et al., 2004, for similar multisensory findings; see Matusz et al., in revision, for cross-modal results on predictability enabling the…”
Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg (2015, background): “1 To our knowledge semantic congruence does not modulate eMSI (Fort et al., 2002b; Molholm et al., 2004; Yuval-Greenberg and Deouell, 2007).”
The role of auditory cortices in the retrieval of single‐trial auditory–visual object memories (2015, background): “that multisensory representations of objects are predominantly localised to visual cortices, reflecting the presumed dominance of vision in object processes (e.g., Diaconescu et al., 2013; Molholm et al., 2004).”