The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect

By Jeroen J. Stekelenburg, Mirjam Keetels. 2015

9 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Colavita effect refers to the phenomenon that when confronted with an audiovisual stimulus, observers report more often to have perceived the visual than the auditory component. The Colavita effect depends on low-level stimulus factors such as spatial and temporal proximity between the unimodal signals. Here, we examined whether the Colavita effect is modulated by synesthetic congruency between visual size and auditory pitch. If the Colavita effect depends on synesthetic congruency, we expect a larger Colavita effect for synesthetically congruent size/pitch (large visual stimulus/low-pitched tone; small visual stimulus/high-pitched tone) than synesthetically incongruent (large visual stimulus/high-pitched tone; small visual stimulus/low-pitched tone) combinations. Participants had to identify stimulus type (visual, auditory or audiovisual). The study replicated the Colavita effect because participants reported more often the visual than auditory component of the audiovisual stimuli. Synesthetic congruency had, however, no effect on the magnitude of the Colavita effect. EEG recordings to congruent and incongruent audiovisual pairings showed a late frontal congruency effect at 400–550 ms and an occipitoparietal effect at 690–800 ms with neural sources in the anterior cingulate and premotor cortex for the 400- to 550-ms window and premotor cortex, inferior parietal lobule and the posterior middle temporal gyrus for the 690- to 800-ms window. The electrophysiological data show that synesthetic congruency was probably detected in a processing stage subsequent to the Colavita effect. We conclude that—in a modality detection task—the Colavita effect can be modulated by low-level structural factors but not by higher-order associations between auditory and visual inputs.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Yi-Chuan Chen
  2. Charles Spence
  3. Mirjam Keetels
  4. Jean H. M. Vroomen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Yi-Chuan Chen
  2. Charles Spence
  3. Mirjam Keetels
  4. Jean H. M. Vroomen
  5. Camille Koppen
  6. Jeroen J. Stekelenburg
  7. Carlos Velasco
  8. Andy Woods

In Sensory Systems

  1. Yi-Chuan Chen
  2. Charles Spence
  3. Mirjam Keetels
  4. Carlos Velasco
  5. Andy Woods
  6. Jean H. M. Vroomen
  7. Jeroen J. Stekelenburg
  8. Mary K. Ngo

Citations in the corpus