Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect

By Camille Koppen, Agnès Alsius, Charles Spence. 2008

74 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Yi-Chuan Chen
2. Mirjam Keetels
3. Jean H. M. Vroomen
4. Charles Spence
5. Jeroen J. Stekelenburg
6. Lihan Chen
7. Camille Koppen
8. Carlos Velasco

In Sensory Systems

1. Yi-Chuan Chen
2. Mirjam Keetels
3. Charles Spence
4. Jean H. M. Vroomen
5. Jeroen J. Stekelenburg
6. Carlos Velasco
7. Lihan Chen
8. Andy Woods

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, methodology): “The auditory stimuli in this study consisted of the sound of a cat meowing or a dog woofing, and the visual stimuli consisted of the pictures of a cat and of a dog (Koppen et al., 2008).”
• No effect of synesthetic congruency on temporal ventriloquism (2010, background): “Also, others who did use meaningful and complex stimuli, nevertheless failed to observe congruency effects ( Koppen, Alsius, & Spence, 2008; Vatakis et al., 2008; Vatakis & Spence, 2006).”
• The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect (2015, methodology): “2013) instead of stimulus modality (Koppen et al. 2008) semantic audiovisual congruency did affect the Colavita effect.”