Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments

By Sandra Heldsinger, Stephen M. Humphry. 2010

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68d14b7e5fae6650f3319243824b72980b12e954

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Matthew Inglis
2. A. Pollitt
3. Ian Jones
4. Keith Weber
5. Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos

In Information Systems and Management

1. A. Pollitt
2. Matthew Inglis
3. Ian Jones

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Kannan Ramchandran
2. A. Pollitt
3. Matthew Inglis
4. Ian Jones
5. Martin J. Wainwright
6. Joseph K. Bradley
7. Sivaraman Balakrishnan
8. David M. Blei

Citations in the corpus

• The method of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (2012, background): “Heldsinger and Humphrys ( 2010 ) showed that CJ could be used to obtain reliable internal assessments from teachers, a domain in which reliability tends to be low and costs rather high.”
• Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependence (2015, methodology): “Lee et al. (2011) consider the inverse problem of measuring the expertise of individuals based on the rankings submitted by them, and the proposed algorithms assume an underlying Thurstone model.”
• The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help? (2015, methodology): “CJ has been used in a range of educational research and practice (e.g., Bramley, 2007; Bramley, Bell & Pollitt, 1998; Heldsinger & Humphry, 2010; Seery, Canty & Phelan, 2012).”