The method of Adaptive Comparative Judgement

By A. Pollitt. 2012

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9ee07fba5ce94468201b4334d7b4791e157e676

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

1. Ian Jones
2. Matthew Inglis
3. Lara Alcock
4. Malcolm Swan

Citations in the corpus

• ASSESSING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING USING COMPARATIVE JUDGEMENT (2015, methodology): “However, such approaches render the development of precise and objective scoring schemes very difficult (Laming, 1990; Pollitt, 2012; Swan & Burkhardt, 2012).”
• Measuring Conceptual Understanding Using Comparative Judgement (2016, unknown): “ When  applied  to  educational   assessment,  CJ  offers  an  alternative  to  traditional  educational  testing  based  on   scoring  rubrics  (Pollitt,  2012).”
• The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help? (2015, methodology): “One potential contribution that CJ might offer education is its suitability for assessing nebulous constructs that are deemed important but which are difficult to specify comprehensively in mark schemes (Pollitt, 2012b).”
• Peer assessment without assessment criteria (2014, methodology): “The system uses an adaptive algorithm based on collective judging history so far to select which pair of scripts to present to judges (this selection is designed to maximize the efficiency of the ordered scale construction, not to personalise the scripts received by any given judge) (Pollitt 2012).”