Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: the mediating role of emotions

By Kristina Murphy, Tom Tyler. 2008

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c1f88b47169fdd4199a62aefea0117649d69481

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Approach or Avoid? Exploring Overall Justice and the Differential Effects of Positive and Negative Emotions (2014, background): “For instance, studies often focus on a single justice dimension (e.g., procedural justice; Murphy & Tyler, 2008; Rupp & Spencer, 2006) instead of exploring the dimensions in tandem and/or examining individuals’ overall experiences of justice.”
Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct (2015, background): “In a longitudinal study, Murphy and Tyler (2008) investigated taxpayers’ perceptions of the treatment they received from the Australian Taxation Office (procedural justice), their emotional reactions to the treatment they received, and their subsequent compliance behavior.”
Individual differences in third-party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment (2011, background): “Moral Outrage and Altruistic Punishment Moral emotions have been revealed as important links between perceived injustice and subsequent behavior (e.g., Barclay, Skarlicki, & Pugh, 2005; Chebat & Slusarczyk, 2005; Murphy & Tyler, 2008).”
Factors Influencing SME Tax Compliance: Evidence from Indonesia (2019, background): “In procedural justice, the main elements for perceived fairness are neutrality of procedures, trustworthiness of tax authorities, politeness, and respectful treatment (Murphy & Tyler, 2008; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults' and youths' willingness to collaborate with police (2015, background): “…that procedural justice can reduce feelings of anger that lead to rule breaking (see Piquero et al. 2004, Piquero et al. 2005, Murphy and Tyler 2008), and can counteract labelling processes that are marginalising and stigmatising (Braithwaite 1989, Norman 2009), the finding that…”
Procedural justice policing and citizen compliance behaviour: the importance of emotion (2015, unknown): “Only one published study to date has explored this relationship within a law enforcement setting (Murphy & Tyler, 2008).”
Trust in the Police (2015, background): “Other than demographics, recent research has shown that individual differences in self-control and emotion influence the relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance (Murphy & Tyler, 2008; Reisig, Wolfe, & Holtfreter, 2011; Wolfe, 2011).”
Considering planned change anew:stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally and meaningfully (2011, background): “…1991). positive emotions (e.g., Ashkanasy, Hartel, & Daus, 2002; Eisenberger, Stinglhamber, Vandenberghe, Sucharski, & Rhoades, 2002; Fisher, 2000; Murphy & Tyler, 2008), they experience pleasant and happy feelings which lead to cooperative attitudes toward change (Kiefer, 2002; Kim & Mauborgne,…”
PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE, AND TASK PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION (2009, background): “Pedhazur and Schmelkin (1991) suggested that causation cannot be inferred without manipulating the independent variable and Stone-Romero and Rosopa (2004) asserted that longitudinal or experimental data is needed to confirm mediation.”