Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation

By William B. Gartner, Paul D. Reynolds, Nancy M. Carter, Kelly G. Shaver. 2004

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/685a91060ea7a8827b38c0cf661ed916c48f4922

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Roy Thurik
2. Johan Wiklund
3. J. Hessels
4. Per Davidsson
5. Dean A. Shepherd
6. F. Liñán
7. E. Douglas
8. C. Brush

Citations in the corpus

• The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies (2020, unknown): “Entrepreneurship is a very complex process (Gartner et al. 2004).”
• One size does not fit all: Entrepreneurial expectancies and growth intentions of US women and men nascent entrepreneurs (2012, methodology): “We used the weighting scheme developed by Shaver (2004), following the principles outlined by Reynolds and Curtin (2004).”
• Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement (2011, background): “For example, we know that some nascent entrepreneurs attempt to set up a business for many years (Gartner et al. 2004; Reynolds 2007).”
• When passion fades: disentangling the temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial passion for founding (2016, background): “By joining our network of interest, our sampled entrepreneurs have engaged in at least two behavioural activities typically used to identify nascent entrepreneurs: Taking workshops to help get one’s business started and joining an organization that offers advice and support to start-ups (Davidsson a”
• Toward A Contextual Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions (2009, background): “However, Kaish and Gilad (1991), Shane and Venkataraman (2000), Eckhardt and Shane (2003), Gustafsson (2006), and Elfving (2008) support the importance of opportunities and opportu-”
• Start‐up Motivations and Growth Intentions of Minority Nascent Entrepreneurs (2010, background): “These weights were developed by the University of Michigan to ensure that the results from the survey can be generalized to the entire population of nascent entrepreneurs (Curtin and Reynolds 2004).”
• Does self‐efficacy affect entrepreneurial investment? (2009, background): “The dataset is unique in that it obtains responses from nascent entrepreneurs who are currently in the startup phase of a new venture (Gartner, 2004).”
• An investigation of hindsight bias in nascent venture activity (2009, background): “The distinctive feature of the PSED is that it identifies and surveys nascent entrepreneurs in the process of starting new ventures (Gartner et al., 2004).1 The screening process involved approximately 60,000 individuals from the mainland United States.”
• Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth (2013, background): “2011), notwithstanding the general observation that entrepreneurs tend to subsequently operate one of two main types of new ventures – either an independence-oriented new venture or a growth-oriented new venture (Kolvereid, 1992; Wennekers & Thurik, 1999; Reynolds, 2000; Gundry & Welsch, 2001; Shave”
• Explaining entrepreneurial intentions, nascent entrepreneurial behavior and new business creation with social cognitive career theory – a 5-year longitudinal analysis (2021, background): “2000; Hills and Singh 2004; Lent and Brown 2006; Krueger 2009; Bird 2015; Liñán and Fayolle 2015).”