Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments

By Fredrik Carlsson, P. Frykblom, Carolina Liljenstolpe. 2003

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/684b38098796674e8fecebb8f6f2b2b937f7f408

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production (2005, background): “These were assumed to interact with the alternative speciflc intercept, fini, and included in the two non-base alternatives since presentation was in generic form ( Carlsson et al., 2003 ).”
Modeling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture (2009, background): “As others have noted (eg, Carlsson et al 2003; Birol et al 2006), incorrect treatment of preference heterogeneity in stated choice data can lead to misleading estimation results.”
Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “, (2006), Carlsson et al., (2003), Othman, et al., (2004), Hanley et al., (2003); Hearne and Salinas (2002); Huybers and Bennett (2003); Mansfield et al.”
Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty (2009, background): “The true distribution is unknown, so in principle any distribution could be applied (Carlsson et al., 2003; Hensher and Greene, 2003), and the normal is the most easily applied (Train and Sonnier, 2005).”
Consumers’ Perspective on Circular Economy Strategy for Reducing Food Waste (2017, unknown): “computed as the negative ratio between the c-th attribute-level coefficient and the coefficient measured in monetary terms that is in our case the one related to the discount ([56,57], Equation (3)).”
Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece (2006, methodology): “The interaction between age square and payment is negative, indicating that much older respondents are willing to pay less for wetland management, as found by Carlsson et al. (2003).”
Valuing Urban Bus Attributes: An Experience in Kolkata (2006, methodology): “SC methods are extensively used to model the behavior of individuals (Hensher and Greene 2001; Hensher 2001; Hensher and Sullivan 2003; Carlsson et al. 2003; Onyango, Govindasamy, and Nayga 2004).”
Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys (2014, background): “However, as found in Carlsson et al. (2008b), the influence of conformity on stated behaviour is not necessarily homogeneous in a sampled population.”
To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes (2012, result): “This, to some extent, follows the existing literature and implies that the marginal WTP has the same distribution as the parameter estimate (e.g. Carlsson et al., 2003).23 For both the unlabelled and labelled experiments, the estimated standard deviations in the RPL model were significant, which…”
Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application (2011, unknown): “Carlsson et al. (2003), Horne et al. (2005), and Jacobsen et al. (2008), for example, have also examined both biodiversity and recreational services of recreation sites.”
What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity (2008, background): “Carlsson et al. (2003) focus on species biodiversity levels in a specific habitat (wetlands), but the size and preservation status of the habitat are not included as attributes.”
Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation (2013, methodology): “unknown, so, in principle, any distribution could be applied (Carlsson et al., 2003; Hensher and Greene, 2003).”
Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009, background): “The true distribution is unknown, so in principle any distribution could be applied (Carlsson et al. 2003; Hensher and Greene 2003).”