To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes
By R. Brännlund, L. Persson. 2012
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87afe6f6e63ce2f009c9d96020295d584d61bffb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “Studies reporting a WTP can make a meaningful addition to the findings in the psychological literature, because they provide clear information on the costs of policy, which is often missing in other studies on public opinion.”
- Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data (2017, background): “…focus group of Kallbekken and Aasen (2010), the general public feels that information campaigns should accompany the implementation of climate policy providing knowledge on its instruments and not only raising awareness on climate change (see also Nyborg et al. 2006; Brannlund and Persson 2012).”
- Public Preferences for Carbon Tax Attributes (2015, methodology): “In addition, the CT design that incorporates tax-free thresholds can take into account the possible distributional inequity of a CT.”