Working memory capacity and resistance to interference

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Auditory Distraction in Semantic Memory: A Process-Based Approach. (2008, background): “, via feature adoption or overwriting) as a passive consequence of the presence of other semantic material within the same representational space in memory (Neath, 2000; Oberauer et al., 2004).”
The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure (2010, methodology): “…-back task because it has been proposed that dual tasks are usually purer estimates of WM capacity (WMC) because they prevent the use of strategies (Oberauer, Lange, & Engle, 2004), and further, because we have previously demonstrated that dual-task versions are well predictive of inter-individual…”
Time and cognitive load in working memory. (2007, background): “It is true that items to be recalled are usually presented for 1,000 ms (Conlin & Gathercole, 2006; Kahana & Jacobs, 2000; Oberauer et al., 2004; Rosen & Engle, 1997; Shah & Miyake, 1996), but it should be remembered that this duration is generally used for convenience and out of habit rather than b”