The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure

By Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, Walter J. Perrig, Beat Meier. Memory, 2010

940 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cdd5a855d4ded37954d52981b618cd9a6576f96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ben-Zheng Li
2. Feng Wan
3. M. Vai
4. Agostinho C. Rosa
5. Wenya Nan
6. S. Pun

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ben-Zheng Li
2. Feng Wan
3. M. Vai
4. Agostinho C. Rosa
5. Wenya Nan
6. S. Pun

Citations in the corpus

• Haemodynamic correlates of bilateral 6 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation during working memory enhancement revealed by fNIRS (2026, unknown): “Its performance indices are considered valid and reliable markers of working memory ability (Jaeggi et al., 2010).”
• Modulating Individual Alpha Frequency through Short-Term Neurofeedback for Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Young Adults (2023, methodology): “The N-back tests were conducted with visuospatial stimuli [45,46], which consisted of light blue squares appearing at one of eight slotted positions around a central fixation cross on a black background (Figure 3).”