Technical Methods Report: Guidelines for Multiple Testing in Impact Evaluations. NCEE 2008-4018.

By Peter Z. Schochet. 2008

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65d0704d2c3b857bde8e1c295ea550ef36cff28d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Latent Class Analysis: An Alternative Perspective on Subgroup Analysis in Prevention and Treatment (2013, background): “Unfortunately, the common Bonferroni correction to adjust the error rate for each test can be overly conservative, and results in a considerable loss of statistical power (Schochet 2008).”
Do Summer Time-Use Gaps Vary by Socioeconomic Status? (2013, methodology): “Second, aggregating time spent in each activity into one measure of involvement eliminates the multiple-comparisons problem, as advocated by Schochet (2008).4 Third, while some categories of parent-child interactions listed in Panel B of Table 1 may stimulate cognitive development more than others,…”
Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test (2011, unknown): “See Schochet (2008) for an accessible and more detailed discussion of the Bonferroni adjustment and other approaches of dealing with multiple testing. where μ is independent of the covariates and has a logistic distribution with mean 0 and scale parameter 1.”
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Alabama Math, Science, and Technology Initiative (AMSTI) (2012, unknown): “Given the exploratory nature of these analyses, the outcomes were not adjusted for multiple comparisons (Schochet 2008).”
Does Preservice Preparation Matter? Examining an Old Question in New Ways (2014, methodology): “Schochet (2008) recommends using this method, described as natural or unit weights, when there is no reason to believe that any one variable contributing to the composite is necessarily more important than the other.”