Attitude-behaviour consistency: the role of group norms, attitude accessibility, and mode of behavioural decision-making

By Joanne R Smith, D. Terry. 2003

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65c2b8a48c8fd9a53508cb95456df2f454edc3a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Laura Glasman
2. M. Hogg
3. Joanne R Smith
4. Dolores Albarracin
5. A. Reid
6. T. Marcinkowski
7. S. van der Linden

In Social Psychology

1. Joanne R Smith
2. M. Hogg
3. Laura Glasman
4. Dolores Albarracin
5. D. van Knippenberg
6. David de Cremer
7. Barbara van Knippenberg
8. David E. Rast

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joanne R Smith
2. Laura Glasman
3. M. Hogg
4. Dolores Albarracin
5. D. van Knippenberg
6. David de Cremer
7. Barbara van Knippenberg
8. David E. Rast

Citations in the corpus

• Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. (2006, background): “Other findings by Smith and Terry (2003) and White, Hogg, and Terry (2002) discussed the influence of in-group norms on the attitude– behavior relation.”
• Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective (2007, background): “…factors, such as the salience or importance of a social identity and group norms, have more impact on the attitude – behaviour relationship than more purely cognitive factors, such as attitude accessibility or mode of decision-making (Smith & Terry, 2003; Terry et al., 2000a; Wellen et al., 1998).”