The opposable mind : winning through integrative thinking

By Roger Martin. 2009

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65b991751594331190e41fc1eeb7a4c90c89b836

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Blake E. Ashforth
2. Kristie M. Rogers
3. Michael G. Pratt
4. Camille Pradies
5. J. Petriglieri
6. Glen E. Kreiner
7. Dean A. Shepherd
8. David M. Sluss

Citations in the corpus

• Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach (2014, background): “Martin (2009) describes how a sharp increase in research and development spending at Procter & Gamble (P&G) led to disappointing results and thus to ambivalence about the desirability of such spending (is it a good investment or a bad investment?).”
• The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective (2017, unknown): “These findings are in line with related research on integrative thinking (Martin, 2007) and strategic decision making with its recent emphasis on integrating intuition and rationality for optimal decision outcome (Elbanna, 2006; Elbanna & Child, 2007; Hitt & Tyler, 1991; Langley et al., 1995).”