Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity

By E. Sedgwick. 2003

2,188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65728d04424627e891f3cc62bf10138f5502fcb7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

In Cultural Studies

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Citations in the corpus

The Affective Turn (2008, background): “In this context, the turn to affect, as Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (2003) proposed, could lead cultural criticism from the ‘paranoid strong’ theorizing of deconstructive approaches, while making it possible to reverse the effects of trauma.”
The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory (2013, background): “The “basic emotions” or “affect programs” are genetically hardwired responses, products of human evolution, that are expressed in autonomic behavioral patterns (such as characteristic facial expressions for fear or disgust) (Damasio 1994; Leys 2011:438–439; Sedgwick 2003).”
Affect, race, and white discomfort in schooling: decolonial strategies for ‘pedagogies of discomfort’ (2018, background): “…therefore, is identifying and examining how discomforting feelings are manifest in different settings, how they are ‘attached to things, people, ideas, sensations, relations, activities, ambitions, institutions, and any number of other things, including other affects’ (Sedgwick 2003, 19).”
Trends in the Turn to Affect (2015, methodology): “For Sedgwick and Frank (1995; Sedgwick, 2003), the psychology of choice for their investigation of affect was the work of Yale Professor Silvan Tomkins, writing in the 1960s.”
An Economic Ethics for the Anthropocene (2012, background): “Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (2003) takes us, in her book Touching Feeling, to a similar edgy location.”
Biology’s Gift: Interrogating the Turn to Affect (2010, neutral): “Sedgwick and Frank’s term ‘theory’ referred to the shared assumptions guiding research in a number of related disciplines spanning the humanities, history, and parts of anthropology and sociology. They understood theory in the mid 1990s to comprise, therefore, the combined effects of Continental phi”
Emotional styles – concepts and challenges (2012, background): “This model escapes the problematic dichotomy of freedom and compulsion and stresses instead the ‘middle ranges of agency [that] offer space for effectual creativity or change’ (Sedgwick 2003, 12f.).”
Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies (2018, background): “The expression denotes an experience that occurs before and together with the construction of subjectivity across human and non-human materialities (Anderson, 2009; Sedgwick, 2003).”
Diverse economies: performative practices for `other worlds' (2008, background): “…by the queer reading of sexuality and gender that appreciates the wide diversity of biological, emotional, social and cultural manifestations of sexuality and gender without subordinating them to the binary hierarchies of heterosexual and homosexual, male and female (Sedgwick, 1993; Butler, 1993).”
Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters (2017, positive): “We also recognized that for others, affect offered novel ways of moving beyond the inherent pessimism of poststructuralist theory and its perceived emphasis on the domination of the subject by power (Sedgwick, 2003).”
Feeling abstinent? Feeling comprehensive? Touching the affects of sexuality curricula (2010, background): “Learners and teachers are directed to feel that surprises in sexual knowledge are bad (Sedgwick 2003).”