Trends in the Turn to Affect

By M. Wetherell. 2015

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b8b40de6daa154596588c9750da48b9ccfcc19b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

1. R. Friedland
2. J. McAvoy
3. Marloes Geboers
4. Chad Thomas Van De Wiele
5. L. Lazard

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. R. Friedland
2. J. McAvoy
3. Marloes Geboers
4. Chad Thomas Van De Wiele
5. L. Lazard

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Friedland
2. J. McAvoy
3. Marloes Geboers
4. Chad Thomas Van De Wiele
5. L. Lazard

Citations in the corpus

• Doing reflexivity in psychological research: What’s the point? What’s the practice? (2020, background): “In a similar vein, “the affective turn” took to task the characterization of affect, emotion, and feeling as irrational and its treatment as secondary to reason and rationality (Wetherell 2014).”
• Machine Vision and Social Media Images: Why Hashtags Matter (2020, background): “…an engagement with the social context to become defined or categorized as a particular kind of emotional state: “The individual’s interpretation and reading of their body is strongly influenced by what can be deduced from the scene at hand and from others’ responses” (Wetherell, 2015, p. 20).”
• Moving Institutional Logics Forward: Emotion and Meaningful Material Practice (2018, background): “(Wetherell, 2015, p. 152) Relatedly, see also the practice specificity of emotion in Nicolini’s practice theory (Nicolini, 2013, p. 5).”