Developing balanced scorecards in local authorities: a comparison of experience

By M. Wisniewski, Snjólfur Ólafsson. 2004

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6508eb8af714a9bf0b5e29138b355359679db2f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Margaret Woods
2. Hannu Rantanen
3. Antti Lönnqvist
4. Paula Kujansivu
5. Harri I. Kulmala
6. Hui Hu
7. Jesmin Islam

In Public Administration

1. Margaret Woods
2. Hannu Rantanen
3. Antti Lönnqvist
4. Paula Kujansivu
5. Harri I. Kulmala
6. Hui Hu
7. Jesmin Islam

In Strategy and Management

1. Margaret Woods
2. Antti Lönnqvist
3. Paula Kujansivu
4. Anis Maaloul
5. Daniel Zéghal

Citations in the corpus

• A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council (2009, background): “…sector bodies encountered “considerable difficulty in clearly defining their strategy” and this view is echoed by other researchers (Chan, 2004; Wisniewski and Olafsson, 2004), alongside an inability to couple operational performance indicators to strategy ( Johnsen, 2001; McAdam et al 2002).”
• Performance measurement systems in the Finnish public sector (2007, background): “These studies discuss, among others, the design (e.g. Wisniewski and Olafsson, 2004), implementation (e.g. Collier, 2006), use (e.g. Ho and Chan, 2002; Wilson et al., 2003) and content of measurement systems (e.g. Van Peursem et al., 1995).”