Biological identification of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) from the Canadian Arctic, using mitochondrial DNA barcodes

By I. Hogg, Paul D. N. Hebert. 2004

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/642cbd5b7c5107de62ba8a098cd18d49ed826bf6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Meier
2. Q. Wheeler
3. Robert H. Hanner
4. R. Ward
5. J. E. Buhay
6. S. Ball
7. B. Mishler
8. K. Will

Citations in the corpus

• DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: The Italian case of “palombo” (Mustelus spp.) (2010, unknown): “…on different taxa, from invertebrates (Hajibabaei, Janzen, Burns, Hallwachs, & Hebert, 2006; Hebert, Penton, Burns, Janzen, & Hallwachs, 2004; Hogg & Hebert, 2004) to vertebrates (Clare, Lim, Engstrom, Eger, & Hebert, 2007; Hebert, Stoeckle, Zemlak, & Francis, 2004; Yoo et al., 2006),…”
• Challenging species delimitation in Collembola: cryptic diversity among common springtails unveiled by DNA barcoding (2012, background): “…values of divergence support specific status for each of these lineages, as they are consistent with interspecific divergences observed so far in Collembola ranging from 8% to 22% (Hogg and Hebert 2004; Stevens and Hogg 2006; Rougerie et al. 2009; McGaughran et al. 2010; Porco et al. 2010a, 2012a).”
• Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes (2004, background): “…of intraspecific and interspecific variation in COI appear similar in various animal groups (Grant and Bowen 1998 [sardines]; Hebert et al. 2003a [moths]; Hogg and Hebert 2004 [springtails]), we propose a standard sequence threshold: 103 the mean intraspecific variation for the group under study.”
• RECOGNIZING DINOFLAGELLATE SPECIES USING ITS rDNA SEQUENCES 1 (2007, methodology): “The feasibility of using a barcoding system has been validated using an approximately 700 bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene (Hebert et al. 2003, 2004, Hogg and Hebert 2004).”
• The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. (2005, methodology): “Published barcode studies have used these types of samples (e.g., Hebert et al., 2004; Hogg and Hebert, 2004).”
• DNA barcoding Australia's fish species (2005, background): “Empirical support for the barcoding concept ranges from studies of invertebrates (e.g. springtails and butterflies) to birds (Hebert et al. 2004a,b; Hogg & Hebert 2004).”
• Identifying earthworms through DNA barcodes (2007, background): “2004), spiders (Barrett and Hebert 2005), springtails (Hogg and Hebert 2004), tropical Lepidoptera (Hajibabaei et al.”
• A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms (2007, background): “There are several papers that attempt to demonstrate the functionality and usefulness of DNA barcoding: e.g., Hogg and Hebert (2004) report that they were able to ‘‘successfully discriminate’’ between all of the species of Collembola from the Canadian arctic in their data set.”
• The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. (2005, background): “There is nothing exceptional about the barcode results for Acronicta—studies on soil invertebrates from the arctic and on lepidopterans from the tropics show similar success in species resolution (Hogg and Hebert, 2004; Janzen et al., 2005).”
• Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes (2005, methodology): “Species in a variety of animal groups have been discriminated reliably using an ;650-base-pair fragment of the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COI) (Hebert et al. 2003a, 2004a, b, Hogg and Hebert 2004).”
• The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. (2009, background): “…species-level identifications has now been validated for many groups of animals (Waugh, 2007), both invertebrate and vertebrate (e.g. springtails, Hogg & Hebert, 2004; butterflies, Hebert et al., 2004a; Hajibabaei et al., 2006a, but see Elias et al., 2007; crustaceans, Costa et al., 2007;…”
• Comment on "Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes" (2005, background): “Barrett and Hebert (2005) extend DNA barcoding, a version of the “DNA taxonomy” paradigm (Tautz et al. 2002, 2003; Blaxter 2003, 2004; Blaxter and Floyd 2003; Hebert et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2004a, 2004b; Hogg and Hebert 2004), to arachnids and show that it is possible to identify members of a mostly lo”