The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL.

By R. Ward, Robert H. Hanner, Paul D. N. Hebert. Journal of Fish Biology, 2009

966 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b451fb180978e03fd2f768e663347730d7515734

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

DNA barcoding reveals a high incidence of fish species misrepresentation and substitution on the South African market (2012, background): “…the Barcode of Life (CBOL) has led to the initiation of a number of international collaborative research efforts, including the Fish Barcode of Life Initiative (FISH-BOL), which aims to barcode all fish species of the world (Steinke & Hanner, 2011; Swartz, Mwale, & Hanner, 2008; Ward et al., 2009).”
The diet of deepwater sharks and the benefits of using DNA identification of prey (2010, background): “D. licha has been valued for its flesh (Francis, 1998), but may be the least common species (Wetherbee, 2000).”
Identification of the larval and juvenile stages of the Cubera Snapper, Lutjanus cyanopterus, using DNA barcoding (2009, background): “2 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2009 Magnolia Press VICTOR ET AL. ( Ward et al. 2009 ).”
DNA Barcoding, species delineation and taxonomy: a historical perspective (2015, neutral): “Much of the controversy related to the integration of DNA barcoding into the taxonomic workflow has been related to the use of DNA sequences in delineating species [45-47] [20, 36, 39, 62].”
MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species (2015, background): “Note that we were unable to find such a region within the barcoding region of the aligned COI gene sequences, which have been frequently used as the marker of choice also in fishes [33].”
Using DNA barcodes to connect adults and early life stages of marine fishes from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: potential in fisheries management (2010, result): “Conclusion and general remarks The present study has reinforced the conclusions reached in earlier DNA-barcoding studies of fish, which have demonstrated 98% success in the identification of marine species (Ward et al. 2009), by extending results to a new biogeographic region, the Caribbean.”
Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries (2015, background): “Fisheries species are particularly well represented in international DNA databases because of the ongoing, dedicated program designed to establish this baseline (Ward et al. 2009).”
Elasmobranch Phylogeny: A Mitochondrial Estimate Based on 595 Species (2012, neutral): “…2009; Serra-Pereira et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2008; Spies et al., 2006; Straube et al., 2010, 2011; Toffoli et al., 2008; Ward and Holmes, 2007; Ward et al., 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009; Wong et al., 2009; Wynen et al., 2009; Zemlak et al., 2009), driven in part by the various Barcode of Life…”
DNA Barcodes for Marine Biodiversity: Moving Fast Forward? (2010, neutral): “org) [82].”
Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology (2011, background): “The major targets are fish (Fish-BOL; Ward et al. 2009), birds (ABBI; Hebert et al. 2004a), mammals (Mammalia Barcode of Life), marine life (MarBOL) and insects.”
Non‐specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI (2019, background): “Furthermore, in terms of voucher specimen and location data etc, much of the ribosomal data on GenBank are not validated to the same standard as COI data on BOLD are (Ward et al., 2009).”