Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes

By S. Ball, Paul D. N. Hebert, S. Burian, J. M. Webb. Journal of The North American Benthological Society, 2005

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7936b979a8b17d8eccd993b5e2a7a91aa1d4ae4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms (2007, methodology): “From a sample of 150 mayfly COI sequences representing 80 species in 30 genera, Ball et al. (2005) report that congeneric sequences were 3.”
Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene in ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) and evaluation of its suitability as a biodiversity marker (2010, unknown): “, 2004 a , 2004 b ; Hogg & Hebert, 2004 ; Ball et al.”
DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) (2006, background): “However, our study, as well as other studies on a diversity of animal taxa (Hebert et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2004a, 2004b; Hogg and Hebert 2004; Ball et al. 2005; Barrett and Hebert 2005), so far suggest that very small interspecific divergences are relatively infrequent.”
DNA barcode data confirm new species and reveal cryptic diversity in Chilean Smicridea (Smicridea) (Trichoptera:Hydropsychidae) (2010, background): “Intra- and interspecific variation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from the DNA barcode region can be discriminated in some taxa (e.g., Ball et al. 2005), but not others (e.g., Alexander et al. 2009).”
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera fauna of Churchill (Manitoba, Canada): insights into biodiversity patterns from DNA barcoding (2010, methodology): “This threshold was used because past studies have shown that intraspecific divergences rarely exceed this value in sympatry (Hebert et al. 2003, 2004, Ball et al. 2005, Hogg et al. 2009).”
Identifying Canadian Freshwater Fishes through DNA Barcodes (2008, unknown): “that allow unambiguous identifications [4,5,6,7,8,9,2,10,11,12].”
Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates (2008, methodology): “, sub-unit I of the mitochondrial DNA gene, cytochrome c oxidase) as molecular markers for identifying species (Ball et al. 2005; Kunz 2006).”
Vouchering DNA-barcoded specimens: test of a nondestructive extraction protocol for terrestrial arthropods (2007, background): “…A. Coddington Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA Michael W. Gates United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, USA Allen L. Norrbom United States Department of…”
The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. (2005, background): “Sensitivity tests across 10-fold gradients in rates of mitochondrial evolution revealed high success in species identification from insect groups with both the lowest and highest rates of evolution (Ball et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2005).”