Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks.

By Katya Rubia, Tamara A. Russell, S. Overmeyer, M. Brammer, E. Bullmore, T. Sharma, A. Simmons, Steven C. R. Williams, V. Giampietro, C. Andrew and 1 more. NeuroImage, 2001

1,061 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64085a5bdc0430dc4bbcf5aa2dcf6e484f225e60

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Neurology

Citations in the corpus

Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. (2006, background): “Lesion studies (Goldman-Rakic, 1987; Rakic, Bourgeois, & GoldmanRakic, 1994; Shallice, 1982) and functional imaging experiments (e.g. Casey et al., 1997; Rubia et al., 2001; Rubia, Smith, Brammer, & Taylor, 2003) suggest that such skills rely heavily on the frontal lobes.”
Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. (2011, neutral): “However, it appears that Go/NoGo tasks more reliably activate the left frontal cortex than does the SSRT, possibly because of the additional response selection processes recruited (Rubia et al., 2001; see Eagle et al., 2008a).”
Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: evidence from fMRI. (2002, background): “Insular activa- tion is remarkably ubiquitous in imaging studies but 2001; Dove et al., 2000; Rubia et al., 2001).”
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. (2004, background): “…various types of inhibition-related processes proposed is the involvement of the frontal lobes in performing the representative tasks, although few investigations have examined whether the specific frontal regions involved in these tasks overlap (but see Konishi et al., 1999; Rubia et al., 2001).”
Automatic and Controlled Response Inhibition: Associative Learning in the Go/No-Go and Stop-Signal Paradigms (2008, neutral): “This suggests that the results of our go/no-go experiments can be generalized to versions of the go/no-go task in which the proportion of no-go trials is lower than 50% (see e.g., Hershey et al., 2004; Rubia et al., 2001; Schulz et al., 2004; Wager et al., 2005).”
Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities (2007, methodology): “…Matsubara et al., 2004; Aron et al., 2003; Bunge et al., 2002; Durston et al., 2002; Braver et al., 2001; Liddle et al., 2001; Menon et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2001; Sakagami et al., 2001; de Zubicaray et al., 2000; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al. 1998; Kawashima et al., 1996; Funahashi et…”
Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis (2004, background): “…inhibition have consistently reported activations in the anterior insula and nearby ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (D'Esposito et al., 1999; Jonides et al., 1998; Rubia et al., 2001), the insula may play a selective role in the interference resolution component of attention shifting paradigms.”
The Common Neural Basis of Exerting Self-Control in Multiple Domains (2009, neutral): “, 2001), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; Garavan et al., 2002; Rubia et al., 2001), and subthalamic nucleus (STN; Aron & Poldrack, 2006) are sometimes found to be active during motor inhibition tasks.”
Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks (2011, methodology): “However, most of these studies, as well as others that followed (Liddle et al., 2001; Menon et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2001; Wager et al., 2005; Watanabe et al., 2002) did observe activations in bilateral dorsolateral and ventrolateral PFC, as well as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and pre-sup”
Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks (2007, background): “Although future research will be needed to test these hypotheses and add further to our understanding of how each region performs interference resolution, our data suggest that the right IFG is important during response execution, the right DLPFC and ACC during response selection, and the left…”
Social cognitive development during adolescence. (2006, background): “We know from executive function studies that the ability to suppress impulses develops during adolescence, perhaps in line with PFC maturation (Casey et al., 1997; Rubia et al., 2001; Adleman et al., 2002; Tamm et al., 2002).”
Opposite Effects of Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Human Brain Function and Psychopathology (2010, result): “001 43 À67 4 19 Left occipital cortex À14 À78 9 9 0.01 Cannabinoid effects on brain and behavior S Bhattacharyya et al inhibition network (Rubia et al, 2001), opposite effects of D-9-THC and CBD in the parahippocampal areas during the response inhibition task is consistent with the high density of…”
Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI (2005, background): “This sort of inhibition may occur only at the response-selection or execution stages (Rubia et al., 2001), as there is only a single imperative stimulus that must be attended at any given time, and no prior learning builds an association between the ‘‘no-go’’ stimulus and either the ‘‘go’’ stimulus ”
Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection (2003, methodology): “Rather than measuring selective inhibition that can be planned beforehand as in a go/no-go task by careful, selective attention to the stimuli, they measure withholding of a triggered motor response that may already be on its way to execution (Rubia et al., 2001).”
Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction (2002, background): “…of the previous rule in the Wisconsin Card Sorting task (Konishi et al., 1999), response inhibition in the Stop paradigm (Pliszka et al., 2000; Rubia et al., 2001), and suppression of imitative behavior (Brass et al., 2001), and a range of clinical disinhibition syndromes appear to follow…”
Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. (2013, background): “Rubia et al. (2001) were the first to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess common and specific patterns of activations with go/ no-go and stop signal variants.”