Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection

By Katya Rubia, Anna B. Smith, M. Brammer, E. Taylor. NeuroImage, 2003

857 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d486c890c7ff90a9812f0a39edaf8d7e5842f7d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Conversion hystérique, hypnose et imagerie cérébrale (2010, neutral): “, 2008), including no-go (Konishi et al., 1998; Rubia et al., 2003) or stop-signal tasks (Aron et al.”
Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI (2007, background): “Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that going activates a premotor–striatal–pallidal–motorcortical circuit (Aron and Poldrack, 2006), whereas stopping activates prefrontal regions, especially the right inferior frontal cortex (IFC) (Rubia et al., 2003; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Pl”
Probing Compulsive and Impulsive Behaviors, from Animal Models to Endophenotypes: A Narrative Review (2010, background): “…task (Aron and Poldrack, 2005), mediated in human beings through activation of right inferior frontal (RIF) cortex and its subcortical connections (Rubia et al, 2003) and modulated in rats and human beings by norepinephrine (Chamberlain et al, 2006c, 2007a; Cottrell et al, 2008), but not…”
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008, background): “Event-related fMRI studies showed that (mainly) parietal and frontal brain regions are more activated when inhibition is unsuccessful [ 15 ,16,18,19].”
Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event‐related tasks of cognitive control (2006, background): “Right inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex and its connections to the caudate have been shown to mediate motor response inhibition in Go/no-go and Stop tasks [Durston et al., 2002b; Konishi et al., 1998; Menon et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2001, 2003].”
Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task (2008, methodology): “Isolating the neural correlates of response inhibition during the SST Previous neuroimaging studies employing the SST have examined the cortical processes of response inhibition (Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Li et al., 2006a; Liddle et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2003, 2005).”
Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, positive): “Considered alongside a substantial body of neuroimaging research (Kawashima et al., 1996; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1999; Rubia et al., 2003; Swainson et al., 2003; Aron et al., 2004, 2007a; Morita et al., 2004; Aron and Poldrack, 2006), these findings suggest that inhibitory control is…”
Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. (2004, background): “…2002), caudal dlPFC (de Zubicaray, Andrew, Zelaya, Williams, & Dumanoir, 2000), and vlPFC (Bunge, Dudukovic et al., 2002; Konishi et al., 1999; Rubia et al., 2003) in response inhibition in these tasks, and the greater the damage to vlPFC in lesion-patients, the more impaired is SSRT (Aron,…”
Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe (2006, background): “In humans, neuroimaging studies have revealed selective activation of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and inferior parietal cortex of the right hemisphere during inhibition of an intended action (Rubia et al., 2003; Swainson et al., 2003; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi e”