Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI

By Tor D. Wager, Ching-Yune C. Sylvester, Steven C. Lacey, Derek Evan Nee, Michael S. Franklin, John Jonides. NeuroImage, 2005

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/791dbfb87f1f420486cef29d42187343d125adc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition (2008, background): “Wager, Nee, and colleagues have made this observation as well, based on prior experimental [25] and meta-analytic [43] evidence from tasks of interference resolution.”
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences (2017, unknown): “Response control provides a useful illustrative example of this issue, as it is often assumed that a common response control trait underlies performance on these tasks (for a review, see Bari & Robbins, 2013), though this assumption has received mixed support from correlational research (Aichert et ”
Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks (2007, background): “Although a study comparing the go/no-go, flanker, and SRC tasks in the same subjects found several neural regions in common to all (Wager et al., 2005), the only overlap we found was that between the go/no-go and the SRC tasks in the left premotor cortex.”
The Common Neural Basis of Exerting Self-Control in Multiple Domains (2009, unknown): “…analyses showed that right IFC and/or right anterior insula were active in adults across all tasks during the inhibition/con ict trials, the region commonly associated with response inhibition in go/no-go and stop-signal tasks (Bunge et al., 2002; Konishi et al., 1999; Wager et al., 2005).”
Automatic and Controlled Response Inhibition: Associative Learning in the Go/No-Go and Stop-Signal Paradigms (2008, unknown): “This suggests that the results of our go/no-go experiments can be generalized to versions of the go/no-go task in which the proportion of no-go trials is lower than 50% (see e.g., Hershey et al., 2004; Rubia et al., 2001; Schulz et al., 2004; Wager et al., 2005).”
Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, unknown): “How can we reconcile evidence of overlapping cortical networks for response inhibition/selection (Rubia et al., 2001; Wager et al., 2005) with the dissociable behavioural consequences of MPH (Scheres et al., 2003) or TMS (Chambers et al., 2007)?”
Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view" (2007, unknown): “Lorenz, Sylvester, Jonides, & Smith, 2003; Sylvester et al., 2003; Wager et al., 2005 )1.”
Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin (2008, background): “…studies using event-related designs, some studies report inhibitory-associated activation by directly contrasting no-go trials with go trials (Wager et al., 2005; Durston et al., 2002; Watanabe et al., 2002; Liddle et al., 2001), whereas others contrast no-go trials with rest or an implicit…”
Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks (2011, background): “Although not emphasized in most previous studies of response inhibition and interference resolution, Wager, Nee, and colleagues have noted the importance of the bilateral anterior insular cortex for these functions (Wager et al., 2005; Nee et al., 2007).”
Executive Control in Bilingual Language Processing (2006, background): “A recent proposal considers that cognitive control is supported by a brain network involving the insular, prefrontal, and ACC, which resolves interference between competing responses (Wager et al., 2005).”
Neuropsicología de las funciones ejecutivas (2010, background): “…(corteza frontopolar), inhibición (giro frontal inferior, cingulado anterior y núcleo subtalámico) o cambio (corteza orbitofrontal lateral, prefrontal dorsolateral, corteza parietal e ínsula) (Collette et al., 2005, 2006; Cools et al., 2002; Simmonds et al., 2008; Wager et al., 2003, 2005).”
Models of Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal and Stop-Change Paradigms (2008, result): “The observed functional dependence between different kinds of inhibition is also consistent with neuroimaging studies, which showed overlapping brain structures in different inhibitory tasks (Aron et al., 2004; Derrfuss et al., 2004; Wager et al., 2005).”