Why space matters in technological innovation systems – the global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology

By C. Binz, Bernhard Truffer, Lars Coenen. 2014

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62f2ecab4b6aea3c1e6f1ec3f6555faec0ec89e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Industrial Diversification in Europe: The Differentiated Role of Relatedness (2018, background): “This calls for a multiscalar perspective to assess the relative importance of local and nonlocal capabilities (Binz, Truffer, and Coenen 2014).”
The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, background): “We, therefore, embrace recent studies that analyze how TIS structures in different countries build upon and complement each other (Bento and Fontes, 2015; Quitzow, 2015) or how TIS actors are linked through knowledge networks at a global scale (Binz et al., 2014).”
Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts (2017, background): “In 25 particular, existing concepts were criticized for remaining rather vague in their conceptualization of 26 interdependencies between various territorial subsystems at an international level (Binz et al., 2014; 27 Coenen et al., 2012; Grillitsch and Trippl, 2013; Wieczorek et al., 2015a).”
Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda (2017, unknown): “…is regional and national policy-makers, considering IS structures that transcend the territorial boundaries of their regions or countries may be necessary because they impact the very conditions for carrying out successful innovation in a specific region (Binz et al. , 2014; Boschma et al. , 2017).”
Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity (2019, background): “…of a balanced 67 interplay among six core development processes (also called system functions; see Bergek et al., 68 2008; Hekkert et al., 2007; Binz et al., 2014): the generation of knowledge, entrepreneurial 69 experimentation, the mobilization of resources, the formation of markets,…”
Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda (2017, unknown): “This requires a multi-scalar perspective that investigates the importance of capabilities that are tapped not only from local resources but also through network linkages at various spatial scales, from the local to the global level (Binz et al., 2014).”
The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech (2015, methodology): “This is a problem because analysts have often conflated national borders with innovation system boundaries (Binz et al., 2014; Coenen et al., 2012).”
Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience (2015, background): “…COENEN (2012) explain that this transition literature has to incorporate a spatial dimension, as regions differ in their potentials to sustainable transformations, and transition processes are multi-scalar phenomena in which changes co-occur at different spatial scales (see also BINZ et al., 2014).”