Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts

By C. Binz, Bernhard Truffer. 2017

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2ef91b441275ebbe0b676d50f3424673b7e6677

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to keep warming below 1.5°C? (2019, background): “More generally, Binz and Truffer (2017) explain how various actors (industries, consultancies, academia, nongovernmental organizations) and their networks interact at several connected levels, from regional to global, to form Global Innovation Systems which facilitate both the evolution and uptake…”
Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity (2019, methodology): “…technology 502 and applied different forms of institutional work to maintain the established standards that were 503 once supported by the Chinese government and are still predominant in the international 504 professional community (the global regime so to speak, see Fünfschilling and Binz 2017).”
New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges (2021, background): “RIS are inserted into national and supranational regulatory and policy frameworks and innovation dynamics often include actors and factors from local to global scales (Binz & Truffer, 2017).”
Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views (2018, methodology): “But also these latter approaches have been criticized for being too little theory-based, overly static and too much confined to predefined territories such as regions or countries (Binz & Truffer, 2017; Uyarra, 2010; Weber & Truffer, 2017).”
Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development (2019, background): “…from a stronger integration of insights from the literature on global production and innovation networks and multi-scalar innovation systems (Binz & Truffer, 2017; Coe, Dicken, & Hess, 2008; Cooke, 2013; Yeung & Coe, 2015) and the significance of non-spatial proximity as supplements to…”