Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda

By K. Matthias Weber, Bernhard Truffer. 2017

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21444686292ac181500f392b5dcf6b053c3abbd9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Innovation Systems for Transformations towards Sustainability? Taking the Normative Dimension Seriously (2017, unknown): “The framework has been adapted to various levels [33,48,51] including national (e.”
Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts (2017, background): “This calls for a more integrative view in which various innovation system perspectives and related literatures on the globalization of innovation stop living parallel lives and start talking to each other in more engaged and reciprocal ways (Martin, 2016; Weber and Truffer, 2017).”
Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions (2020, background): “Innovation system (IS) theory suggests that innovation occurs in the context of an entire system and not only through entrepreneurs (Twomey and Gaziulusoy 2014; Weber and Truffer 2017).”
Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views (2018, background): “These various elements jointly generate synergies and systemic effects that go beyond the contributions of individual actors or elements (Tödtling & Trippl, 2011; Weber & Truffer, 2017).”
Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development (2019, background): “Following this line of thought, one could argue that RISs often hamper entrepreneurship and innovation in areas that are new for a region and are therefore not necessarily supportive to the development of new growth paths (Tödtling & Trippl, 2013; Weber & Truffer, 2017).”
Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency (2018, background): “This means that stable RISs can be ‘prone to lockin and path dependency [as they are] largely geared to generate incremental innovations and gradual change’ (Boschma et al. 2017, 36), and well-functioning RISs often do not support development of new growth paths (Weber and Truffer 2017).”
Innovation policy: What, why, and how (2017, background): “Subsequently, the provision of these various factors, which are often seen as complementary, has in the innovation-systems literature invariably been labelled functions, processes, or activities (Edquist, 2004; Bergek et al. , 2008 a ; Hekkert and Negro, 2009; Weber and Truffer, 2017, this issue).”