The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms

By Jochen Markard, Marko P. Hekkert, Staffan Jacobsson. 2015

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d97f3694e5d8159fbeed0398610164cbd83494d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Xiao-Shan Yap
2. Bernhard Truffer
3. Jochen Markard
4. Frank W. Geels
5. P. Andrews-Speed

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Xiao-Shan Yap
2. Bernhard Truffer
3. Marko P. Hekkert
4. Jochen Markard
5. Lars Coenen
6. Richard Harris

In Strategy and Management

1. Xiao-Shan Yap
2. Bernhard Truffer
3. Michaela Trippl

Citations in the corpus

• Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity (2019, background): “We follow Markard et al. (2015) and Bergek et al. (2015) in their claim that nothing precludes the TIS framework from being extended to address broader socio-technical transformation processes.”
• Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “Contrasting approaches within this broad field include the functional approach to ‘technological innovation systems (TIS)’ (Markard et al. 2015), ‘transition management’ (Rotmans & Loorbach 2008), ‘strategic niche management’ (Witkamp et al. 2011) and the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) (Geels 2010).”