Gender Electrified: ERP Evidence on the Syntactic Nature of Gender Processing

By Peter Hagoort, Colin M. Brown. 1999

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Natural Language Processing

Citations in the corpus

Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution (2019, background): “In neurolinguistic studies, Osterhout and Mobley [1995] and Hagoort and Brown [1999] looked at event-related potential (ERP) violations for reflexive pronouns and antecedent in English, finding similar effects to violations of number agreement, but different effects from semantic violations.”
Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution: An Analysis of Gender and Bias Throughout the Machine Learning Lifecycle* (2021, background): “In neurolinguistic studies, Osterhout and Mobley (1995) and Hagoort and Brown (1999) looked at event-related potential (ERP) violations for reﬂexive pronouns and antecedent in English, ﬁnding similar e ﬀ ects to violations of number agreement, but di ﬀ erent e ﬀ ects from semantic violations.”
On the Relationships Between the Grammatical Genders of Inanimate Nouns and Their Co-Occurring Adjectives and Verbs (2020, background): “, 2008; Harbour, 2011; Kramer, 2014, 2015), while some cognitive scientists have shown that grammatical genders can be a perceptual cue—for example, human brain responses exhibit sensitivity to gender mismatches in several different languages (Osterhout and Mobley, 1995; Hagoort and Brown, 1999; Vig”
Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: a cross-sectional study (2001, background): “Van Turenhout, Hagoort and Brown (1999) suggest that a noun's lemma is selected before its phonological form: ``syntax precedes phonology by about 40 milliseconds'' (p. 672).”
Age of acquisition: its neural and computational mechanisms. (2007, unknown): “…N400, P600, and left anterior negativity [LAN]) are sensitive to semantic and syntactic violations (Atchley et al., 2006; Friederici, Hahne, & Mecklinger, 1996; Hagoort, 2003; Hagoort & Brown, 1999; Kutas & Hillyard, 1980; Kutas & Van Petten, 1988; Osterhout, Allen, McLaughlin, & Inoue, 2002 ).”
WHEN GENDER AND LOOKING GO HAND IN HAND (2013, unknown): “…Lukatela, & Turvey, 1988 ; Colé & Segui, 1994 ; Costa et al., 2003 ; Dahan et al., 2000 ; Faussart et al., 1999 ; Grosjean et al., 1994 ; Gurjanov et al., 1985 ; Hagoort & Brown, 1999 ; Jacobsen, 1999 ; Jakubowicz & Faussart, 1998 ; Lew-Williams & Fernald, 2007 ; Schmidt, 1986 ; van Berkum, 1996 ).”
Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do (2013, background): “Analyses of the final critical noun revealed a significant P600 effect suggesting that Spanish speakers of English show on-line sensitivity to phonological agreement violations (Barber & Carreiras, 2005; Foucart & Frenck-Mestre, 2011; Gillon-Dowens et al., 2010; Hagoort & Brown, 1999).”
Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study (2003, background): “The relevance of the P600 effect for this study is that it is elicited by content words with contextually anomalous inflections (Hagoort & Brown, 1994, 1999; MORPHOLOGY IN SENTENCE PROCESSING 409 Hagoort, Brown, & Groothusen, 1993; Osterhout & Mobley, 1995; Osterhout & Nicol, 1999;…”